TommyScottX - LMAO. Look at Heber having a chat with himself below. We all know that it's
the mad auld C*nT Truthseeker.
You've got us all fooled, you sad, lonely eejit.
TimJackdaw - As usual, truthseeker is misrepresenting actual science when he states that
tiktaalik is not transitional.
Tiktaalik is a transitional fossil; it is to tetrapods what Aurornis is to
birds, troodonts and dromaeosaurids. While it may be that neither is
ancestor to any living animal, they serve as evidence that intermediates
between very different types of vertebrates did once exist. The mixture of
both fish and tetrapod characteristics found in Tiktaalik include these
traits:
Fish:
fish gills
fish scales
fish fins
"Fishapod":
half-fish, half-tetrapod limb bones and joints, including a functional
wrist joint and radiating, fish-like fins instead of toes
half-fish, half-tetrapod ear region
Tetrapod:
tetrapod rib bones
tetrapod mobile neck with separate pectoral girdle
tetrapod lungs
Putative tetrapod footprints found in Poland and reported in Nature in
January 2010 were "securely dated" at 10 million years older than the
oldest known elpistostegids. If this is a true tetrapod record, Tiktaalik
was a "late-surviving relic" rather than the original transitional form. An
alternative interpretation is that the Polish trackways, which do not have
digital impressions, were made by walking fish.
Mike Luostari - This isn't the first time I've seen this. These people seem to be well
adjusted, albeit a bit misguided. They seem to be relatively intelligent
people. With the exception of the dark haired woman. She comes off as
blissfully ignorant. They're definitely not stupid. How can someone who's
relatively well educated totally dismiss evolution and believe in the young
earth theology? Young kids understand the fossil record. Young kids
understand, in a rudimentary way, how the grand canyon was formed and what
the different layers mean. These are adults that believe that the earth is
only 6000 years old, Noah floated around in a great flood in a magical boat
and that humans are somehow removed from the animal kingdom. Take your
average junior high student, they can explain in a very basic way, what the
theory of evolution is. I'm not against people of Faith, it can do great
things and bring happiness to people going through difficult times. Isn't
it a bit of a slight against god to think the Earth is only 6,000 years old
and the entire population of all the animals and humans started on a
magical boat ride? Why won't these diehards go, "God created the universe
and all the planets and perfected everything by making species evolve into
other, more successful species and when he was done creating all these
great wonderful things he made man to hold dominion over all of it"? That
certainly makes their God look a whole lot more powerful and omnipotent
than limiting everything to such a small period of time.
TimJackdaw - If you do a google search for "letters to creationists grand canyon" you
can find an article which examines in great detail the formation of the
grand canyon. It also contains, among other things, info about how creation
scientists deceive people, including other creationists. It's a long
article, but worth reading for creationists and non-creationists. Youtube
doesn't seem to allow me to post a link to it, but a google search should
find it.
Quote:
"...we attempt to understand how intelligent, good-willed folks like these
YE creationists can continue to believe that they are right and the rest of
the world is wrong in interpreting the geology of the Grand Canyon. We
find a consistent pattern of misrepresentation and withholding of
information by the YE creationist scientists who have the training to know
better. By presenting only partial truths, they have succeeded in
misleading a large fraction of American evangelical Christians. On one
level, this is dishonest and deceitful, yet these folks operate with
apparently clear consciences. The cognitive dissonance factor appears to
be a reasonable psychological explanation for their behavior."
Pascals Triangle - It's been proved beyond doubt that Jesus was not born in Bethlehem. Yet
again the bible is exposed as a collection of myths, fables, inventions and
lies. The bedrock of creationism?...oh my word :-D
Liam StClair - @Trruthseeker. May I remind you that I fed the comments from your seven
known YT accounts into the authorship identity program "Signature". There's
very little doubt that those accounts have the same author. You are a multi
account prat and not very good at it. I think you're at the high end of the
autism spectrum.
Mindova Matta - There is no historical reference to Jesus’ life, death or the
crucifixion―nothing at all. John E. Remsburg, in his classic book The
Christ: A Critical Review and Analysis of the Evidence of His Existence1
lists the following contemporary historians/writers who lived during the
time, or within a century after the time, that Jesus was supposed to have
lived:
Apollonius Persius Appian Petronius
Arrian Phaedrus Aulus Gellius
Philo-Judaeus
Columella Phlegon Damis Pliny the Elder
Dio Chrysostom Pliny the Younger Dion Pruseus Plutarch
Epictetus Pompon Mela Favorinus Ptolemy
Florus Lucius Quintilian Hermogones Quintius
Curtius
Josephus Seneca Justus of Tiberius
Silius Italicus
Juvenal Statius Lucanus Suetonius
Lucian Tacitus Lysias Theon of
Smyran
Martial Valerius Flaccus Paterculus Valerius
Maximus
Pausanias
According to Remsburg,
“Enough of the writings of the authors named in the foregoing list remains
to form a library. Yet in this mass of Jewish and Pagan literature, aside
from two forged passages in the works of a Jewish author, and two disputed
passages in the works of Roman writers, there is to be found no mention of
Jesus Christ.”
Nor, we may add, do any of these authors make note of the disciples or
apostles; increasing the embarrassment from the silence of history
concerning the foundation of Christianity. In other words, the only
information of the life of Jesus comes from Christian believers.
Reason would dictate that if all the miracles which Jesus supposedly
performed or surrounded him:
1. Being born of a virgin mother;
2. Three Magi following the brightest star forever to see the demigod;
3. The slaying of the innocent babies;
4. Raising the dead, healing the blind and lame;
4. Having the sky turn to blackness when Jesus died;
5. Earthquakes in the region;
6. The zombie saints coming out of their graves going to Jerusalem; and
7. The Resurrection.
that at least one of these world headline news events would have at least a
small mention by at least one of the foregoing historian and writers. But,
NO, they are totally silent!
nenafan1 - So... I was searching for my previous comments, asking for evidence for
Creationism and inquiring about the huge deposits of fossils the
Creationist supporters claimed are just such evidence.
I cannot seem to find my comments anywhere. Not sure if they were buried by
a mountain of other comments by Cynthia, truthseeker, and more, or if they
went ahead and censored my comments. Regardless, I hope these sad people
can join the rest of us in truthfully asking for evidence and wanting to
find out what is right. That, or that they stop with any nonsense and let
the rest of us live in peace.
Silas Cole - On the Grand Canyon's Horse Shoe Bend,
http://creation.com/horse-shoe-bend-arizona. Good examples of a massive
flood.
On Noah's Ark, http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c013.html. Good
explanations and good points.
On fossils, http://www.gotquestions.org/fossil-record.html. Good points and
examples are made of how easy it is to misinterpret fossils.
On chimps, http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c018.html,
http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-2-chapter-6-argument-common-design-points-to-common-ancestry.
Easy way to understand why we have similarities in DNA toward the rest of
life.
cullodenflodden - We all know that Cynthia Albrecht is 007Truthseeker's nom de plume at
weekends. He likes to dress up in his Stinky Cynthy Knickers and his Anne
Summers lingerie and pretend that he is a woman. I'm a broad minded chap.
Whatever rocks your Ark, Cynthia.
Brandon Quintana - The law of biogenesis: life only comes from life. Naturalism refuted by
operational science yet again. Abiogenesis=impossible! RNA world or any
other naturalist hypothesis for abiogenesis is not supported by any
observable evidence whatsoever.
007TruthSeeker - Some of our anti-Creationism critics try to lie about transitional fossils.
The least educated bleat about "lots of'm" or "all fossils are
transitional" or some other inanity, while those who think "National Geo."
is a reputable pop-sci magazine keep bringing up fossils once thought to be
transitional, but no longer so credited, such as Tiktaalik, Archaeopteryx
and Australopithicus. If they were to actually read paleontological
journals instead of "National Geo." (which published its article about
Paleoraptor even AFTER they learned that it was a hoax. They never even
apologized. You can look it up) they would realize this, but readers should
be aware.
Joe marine - where would a whale go in the ark?! The last time i looked a whale wasn't
affected by a flood.
A whale can swim and live in the waters and survive without having to go
onto an ark
1978ajax - Endlessly fascinating, and endlessly disturbing that humans can become so
caught up in their religious delusions. There seems to be no end to the
mental twists and turns that they can 'justify' in their own minds, and no
limit to the double-think which enables them to ignore the glaring
contradictions in, and blatant hypocrisy of, their beliefs.
ETA
The conversation between the two girls immediately after being shown the
progression of skulls (48:00) is core to the program, IMO. There you
plainly see how evidence is handled within the delusion.
Paul Stern - I should also explain a bit about those massive fossil graveyards, since
readers may not realize that they have plants and animals from places so
far apart that they had different climates, like bears, crocodiles, foxes,
hippos, wolves and alligators all jumbled together by the millions of tons
and dumped in various places around the earth. Only a massive global flood
could do that.
Cletus Creatard - Hey, Uncle Paul. Why do you sound exactly the same as Great Auntie Cynthia
?
Jon Tranchita - Atheism it's what gives people that have no purpose in life a reason to
hate people who have a purpose through Christ Jesus. All the foolish
atheists gather together on a thread to bash people who believe in
something that was around way before the idea of evolution and thrash
theory.
You're blind to the truth or just ignore it.
Cynthia Albrecht - While it might not be common knowledge, since paleontologists are loath to
talk or write about it for public consumption, the theory of punctuated
equilibrium throws Darwinian evolution (slow and gradual) out and replaces
that with rapid evolution occurring during only brief intervals, hence the
name punctuated equilibrium. The fossil record shows stasis (everything
staying the same), sudden appearance of all species and sometimes what is
interpreted as sudden disappearance (extinction). What the fossil record
does NOT, repeat, NOT show is evolution.
E Gamble - *Amazingly, the damaged mind used to personality of Paulie* to make the
following totally absurd comment: 'You got a "response" from one of the
most egregious of the sad trolls we get here'
I believe that would be me
'claiming that we delete responses just because they disagree with us'
You most certainly DO
'which is ludicrous'
Only because you are too delusional to know what's REALLY happening
'It's the name-calling'
No, no, no!! You are lying. I stated in several post that I was dispensing
with the name-calling and I addressed you in the most courteous manner
possible in about 20 posts. Still, you deleted them all. Also there have
been numerous occasions where new-arrivals, unaware of your dishonesty &
duplicity have simply pointed out your errors. Still, their post were
deleted.
'profanity'
If the post were available for review, I would be obvious that you are
lying.
'and childish lying which causes me to delete'
That's a blatant lie. As with Gould's comments, C-14, the fact that
Malachite Man & Guadeloupe Woman weren't fossilized or even the correct
spelling of Guadeloupe Woman, people repeatedly provided evidence that
contradicted what you said, yet you deleted those posts.
'and not just disagreeing'
And you have the audacity to call people liars.
'I relish a good debate, but we don't get that here'
And you can't see that everyone knows that's a lie!!!
If you want a debate, then say so and choose the person/people you want to
debate. I believe I speak for the gang here when I say everyone not
selected will remain on the sideline and watch as your ignorant ass is
eviscerated.
Now, put up or STFU!!
Do I hear deafening silence??
Morrigan LeFay - You will notice that none of the 3 'biology teachers' can answer a single
question that is put to them. Truthseeker's only answer is to call my
question silly. He comes out with waffle such as 'there were processes that
would oxygenate the water." What processes? Why don't they exist now? If
you really were a biologist you would ask the same questions. If you really
were a teacher you would welcome questions, instead of sneering. Is that
how you treated your students? Deriding them for asking questions? You're
not a teacher. You're a liar. I'd have walked out of your class, got some
books from the library and taught myself instead.
Peter Weber - Since it appears that more than one uneducated troll is trying to resurrect
Tiktaalik and Archaeopteryx as transitional fossil, despite biologists and
paleontologists discarding both of these fossils as truly transitional, I
must remind readers of this fact, and suggest that, if you really want to
know, check it out for yourself. As one wrote, you might check with a
biologist, since they should know, but the particular one you ask may not
have kept up with this topic, and may also be under the false impression
that they are.
Ishyggt Shiggity - Since someone keeps removing my comments in Cynthia's and Paul's comment
chains, I'll post it here.
There aren't a lack of transitional fossils. A transitional fossil is just
a fossil that shows characteristics of both the ancestor and the current
living organism. Some examples of transitional fossil include*:
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Orrorin tugenensis
Ardipithecus ramidus
Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus afarensis
Australopithecus bahrelghazali
Australopithecus africanus
Paranthropus aethiopicus
Paranthropus robustus
Homo habilis
Homo erectus
Paranthropus boisei
Homo antecessor
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo neanderthalensis
And Finally Homo Sapiens: Modern Man.
And for all you people who don't understand punctuated equilibrium, it just
means that during times of extreme environmental changes, adaptations
happen quicker, as harsher environments will naturally select the organism
that reproduce the fastest and with the biggest yield**.
Sources:
*http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils
**http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110622115311.htm,
Rose Brechter - The geologic and fossil records are the surviving evidence that God
preserved for us to testify to the truth that the Earth is very old and was
inhabited for a long period before the seven days of Genesis chapter one.
Those records, written in stone, also provide evidence of a long reign of
Death upon the old Earth and the end of the old world order by a universal
destructive event.
Clearly, if we believe the literal wording of the Bible, there was indeed a
universal creative event during the seven days of Genesis, about 6,000
literal years ago. But the literal wording of the Bible and the Earth's
geology reveals that there is more to the story - it was not the original
creation of all things. Understanding the time gap in Genesis opens a vast
knowledge gap. You just can't rely on your own understanding or the
traditions of man to obtain this knowledge. You have to TRUST THE BOOK.
Rod Byer - This is a favorite Psalm of mine, fitting for us Creationists to sing
together on this thread, Psalm 56:1-4, with the rest to follow:
1 Be merciful to me, my God,
for my enemies are in hot pursuit;
all day long they press their attack.
2 My adversaries pursue me all day long;
in their pride many are attacking me.
3 When I am afraid, I put my trust in you.
4 In God, whose word I praise—
in God I trust and am not afraid.
What can mere mortals do to me?
Mahrai Ziller - LMAO! +007TruthSeeker/Peter Weber/Robert Heber/Paul Stern/Cynthia
Albrecht/Rod Byer/Robert Ernst just fucked up *BIG TIME* here - by replying
to themselves, *BUT FORGETTING TO LOG IN TO A DIFFERENT ACCOUNT FIRST!*
He *LITERALLY* thanks himself for his input, in the exact same way his
other circle jerk sock puppets do - but *STILL* using the same account as
the pretend person they're supposedly thanking!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
WHAT A STUPID FUCKING CUNT.
Check it out, here:
plus(dot)google(dot)com/100524590487442264575/posts/UgjzMy3HuCH
TommyScottX - Of gods and men: Societies living in harsh environments are more likely to
believe in moralizing gods
Date:
November 10, 2014
Source:
National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent)
Summary:
New research finds that cultures living in harsher ecosystems with limited
resources are more prone to a belief in moralizing, high gods. The results
indicate that other cross-disciplinary factors, including as political
complexity, also influence this belief.
Perkin Warbeck - Hi Cynthia. I'm interested in what you have to say about creation. Can you
provide a link to these fossil graveyards? Because I couldn't find them in
a Google search, and would like to learn more about them.
Paul Stern - Perhaps like many readers, I once didn't appreciate how the theory of
punctuated equilibrium throws Darwin's theory out, how massive fossil
graveyards could only have been caused by a massive global flood and how
the carbon-14 content of many carbon-rich materials, like diamonds, coal
and oil, mean that they are only thousands of years old, not many millions
of years, as we are told by many people.
Peter Weber - That first general fact I mentioned, the theory of punctuated equilibrium,
shows how desperate paleontologists are to avoid criticism over the lack of
truly transitional fossils. By 1972, when Drs. Eldredge and Gould first
published a chapter about it, there had been no transitional fossils found,
and it was such an acute embarrassment for the field of paleontology that
something radical had to be done, and their theory was their answer. By
claiming without any corroborative evidence (except, of course, the lack of
transitional fossils) that evolution "must have happened" relatively
quickly for relatively short periods of time, they provide a sort of excuse
why there were no transitional fossils. This tossed Darwin's theory of slow
gradual evolution in the trash, of course, and other paleontologists were
upset, incensed even and complained loudly that this theory was ridiculous.
Some derided it as "evolution by jerks."
dota leavers - 16:20, Where did the whales go in the ARK? Do you call these as
intelligent scientist? Whales are Swiming below the ARK... hahaha! You
should have called a prepared audience, these people where not prepared
about the argument. Its unfair intellectual advantage...
*****************************PROOF
Genesis 6:19-21King James Version (KJV)
19 And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou
bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and
female.
20 Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every
creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come
unto thee, to keep them alive.
21 And take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten, and thou shalt gather
it to thee; and it shall be for food for thee, and for them.
- there was no mention of marine/aquatic life.
He is too dumb to ask the question, and yet the audience haven't realize
its a stupid question.
cullodenflodden - Both phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium are evolutionary
patterns which help us understand how evolution occurs.
*Evidences indicate that both gradualistic and punctuational speciation
have often occurred*
in the history of life, and that morphological stasis or long-term
stability of form - the
equilibrium of punctuated equilibrium is often real rather than an artifact
of dropout in the
fossil record. Paleontologists have observed gradualistic speciation,
punctuational speciation,
and morphological stasis, all in a single series of rocks with
punctuational speciation
occurring about 10 times more frequently than gradualistic speciation.
At present, research is still ongoing on the evolutionary patterns of life;
which of these
evolutionary patterns has a great influence on the existence of very
diverse groups of
organisms on earth. And it is possible that in the next few hundred years
we may have an
answer. But remember that these are just both theories and one or both
could be proven right
or wrong.
International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology
Vol. 3, No. 4, December, 2011
41
007TruthSeeker - Since an uneducated critic has asked why Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik are no
longer considered transitional fossils, I must repeat, again, that
paleontologists have dismissed these fossils from consideration as
transitional. No other species is known to be ancestral to or a descendant
from either of these fossils, which is part of the definition of
transitional, and tetrapod tracks have been discovered in strata supposedly
dated at many millions of years older than Tiktaalik, showing that it was
not ancestral to the tetrapods in the views of paleontologists, at least.
Erato Redux - A very interesting, if not decidedly depressing, documentary by the BBC
where a comedian takes some Creationists, who believe completely in the
Bible and Quran being factual, on a road trip to meet people who don't
share their beliefs. The choice of a comedian, although strange at first
sight, was excellent as his ability to think quickly, gained from his work
as a stand-up comic, works. However, the ability of seemingly reasonably
bright people to ignore the facts and pretty conclusive evidence was truly
amazing.
T Green - The most damning evidence that has been testable during the past hundred
years, that destroys much of what evolution hinges on, is the age of the
sedimentary rocks. It has been seen with Tsunamis, landslides, rapid delta
inundation, volcanoes like Mount St. Helens, to be rapid with many tens of
feet of layered accumulation occurring within hours, or just a few days and
not thousands or millions of years , as many geologists keep banging on
about every time they defend evolution.
As geologists have not witnessed this accumulation first hand, they have no
testable way to determine which was a slow process of sedimentation or
rapid sedimentation. Fossils show rapid inundation because if animal phyla
is not buried rapidly, it ends up being scavenged by the ecosystem, before
it can be entombed in sediments. One of the reason why there are more
shell fish fossils than any other, as the hard shells get left behind by
scavengers. What fossils show are lots of dead creatures that got caught
in a series of catastrophes and not slow millions of years of accumulation.
Sediments accumulate not horizontally but at a 30-45% rolling forward
motion angle. This is determined by the amount of material, its aggregate
gradation and rates of flow for example, the speed at which the water was
flowing tides, floods, land slips, volcanoes. If rapid inundation were not
possible fossilised trees standing up would not be found nor fossilised
foot prints, I am sick and tired of scientists hiding behind poor
unproven science as they desperately try to keep afloat a dead theory.
The sciences linked to prehistory are in dire need of some good science!
Cynthia Albrecht - The other fossilized modern human skeletons found in rock which has been
"dated" at many millions of years are the Malachite Man group, which
included several women and an infant. This is not just the notorious "Moab
Man" fossil, which was stolen and sold by an unscrupulous character, but
numerous other fossils found in the same formation, not far from the
Morrison formation, which is famous for lots of dinosaur fossils.
Brandon Quintana - Open debate challenge to anyone who thinks that the Flood of the Bible was
not a real event. Go to debate.org and search for creationtruth (that's
me). Send me a message and I will set up the debate. If you rather debate
another topic like evolution or cosmology than I would be glad to debate
those things too. I really don't believe evolutionists/uniformitarians have
the evidence on their side. Biblical creation is demonstrably valid. From
genetics to geology to cosmology, the evidence supports the biblical
account of history, not the man-made evolutionary ideas of origins.
TheMarsCydonia - When talking about punctuated equilibrium, Stephen Jay Gould said "it is
infuriating to be quoted again and again by creationists--whether through
design or stupidity, I do not know--as admitting that the fossil record
includes no transitional forms. Transitional forms are generally lacking at
the species level, but they are abundant between larger groups."
Indeed, see how the uneducated creationist troll does exactly how Gould
explained by writing "the theory of punctuated equilibrium, shows that
paleontologists have accepted the sad fact (for them) that there are no
truly transitional fossils".
Even a most severe lack of education like the one possessed by the
creationist troll shouldn't prevent someone from realising that "abundant"
and "no" transistional fossils are opposite.
Gould was wrong on one thing though. It is not always "whether through *design
or stupidity*" the he is quoted, in the case of 007"Truth"seeker, Cynthia
and all the other multiple personalities, it is *both* through *design and
stupidity*.
Paul Stern - Have you learned that the theory of punctuated equilibrium was fought by
other paleontologists when it was first proposed back in 1972? The other
paleontologists knew that PE basically threw out Darwin and his slow
gradual evolution theory and replaced it with PE, which "explains" (without
evidence) that evolution "actually" occurred in relatively short periods of
time, much more quickly than Darwin thought would be the case. Why? How?
They haven't filled in those blanks, yet, but, as soon as they discover
some truly transitional fossils, you can be sure they'll let us "know."
Mahrai Ziller - Surprise surprise, a simple comment that pointed out that there was a
contradiction in the bible, regarding the idiotic claim that the Roman
empire ever held a census with the hilarious caveat that everyone returned
to their place of birth, which is provably false, has been deleted by
creatard fuckwit "Cynthia Albrecht/+007TruthSeeker/Peter Weber/Paul
Stern/Rod Byer/Robert Ernst/Robert Heber" - despite there being nothing
offensive in it.
Yet again, readers can note that this cowardly creationist cunttard has
nothing but bullshit and censorship.
Peter Weber - For what it's worth, there is no doubt in the minds of historians both
Christian and not, that Yeshua (Jesus) was born in Bethlehem. Our trollish
critics think that they can fool readers with the claim that He was not so
born, but even the simplest investigation will discover their willingness
to lie about anything and everything, if they think they can get away with
it.
Jimmy David - A Florida lizard species is puzzling scientist these days, not because it
challenges Evolution, but because it's showing that Evolution can work even
faster than we thought. In as short as 15 years that species went from
having short legs to rather long legs, an evolutive leap that has clearly
enabled the lizards to adapt better to trees, as they now walk on branches
much easier. Search Google for it. How can anyone keep ignoring Evolution
with evidence such as this???????????
Pascals Triangle - The Crazy C masquerading as Peter Weber claims that evolutionists have
provided no evidence for evolution? The silly twat must be as blind
as Geoffrey Gurrumul Yunupingu.
The universal genetic code, the fossil record, genetic commonalities,
common traits in embryos and the abundance of examples of observed
evolution make evolution *undeniable*. All anyone has to do is read Bill
Nye's latest book *Undeniable: Evolution and the Science of Creation*
007TruthSeeker - Readers will run into comments from critics of Creationism, motivated for
reasons other than concern for you and your eternal soul, attacking us
Creationists personally, calling us names and using lots of profanity and
heavy font to make it clear how childish they are, but the worst part is
their incessant lying about us not providing evidence supporting Creation
and refuting evolution, despite our doing so regularly for months. We have
mentioned the theory of punctuated equilibrium, the massive fossil
graveyards with too many kinds of organisms, the high carbon-14 content of
carbon-rich materials such as fossil fuels, attesting to their being only
thousands of years old, not to mention the Guadeloupe Woman group of
fossils and the Malachite Man group, both of which were modern human
skeletal remains buried in rock supposedly many millions of years old. The
best defense our critics can mount, apparently, is to attack those of us
who have spelled the name of the Guadeloupe Woman wrong. A pity, that.
Rod Byer - This is his plea to God, given what his enemies are doing:
7 Because of their wickedness do not let them escape;
in your anger, God, bring the nations down.
8 Record my misery;
list my tears on your scroll
are they not in your record?
sam cross - See THE RED PLANET scientist believe that the cannons on Mars were carved
by a flood. Also creation scientist claim that the cannons were formed by
the ice age which followed the flood as well as the flood which makes the
pouring of water from the bucket experiment invalid. The boat in this video
is nothing like Noah's Ark, also the animals could have been babies, whales
could have survived outside of the ark.See creation.com and type in
dinosoures for the answers about dinosoures,I felt that the question why
didn't you invite a christian geologist on this trip was answered
properly.Mutations changed dna every time we mutate we lose information.See
creation magazine how the fossils are dated.See Milliners experiment in
trying to create life and note that in his total failure to create life he
does not use oxygen an essential ingredient for life ask yourself why.
E Gamble - Did any of you notice where I replied to the mindless wonder's posts a
second time? If you did, you know that directed my comments to specific
claims it made - and nothing more.
But for the second time, all of them are gone.
I wonder how a sane, honest person can crow about how they never receive
meaningful comments or no one will engage them in a respectful exchange
after it does that.
Bu rest assured, it most certainly will
Cynthia Albrecht - Readers will find interesting comments on this thread, but the only
informative ones are by a number of Creationists who comment here, sharing
some fascinating facts about the earth which support Creation and refute
evolution and deep time. These include the theory of punctuated
equilibrium, the massive fossil graveyards and the high carbon-14 content
of carbon-rich materials found deep in the ground, like fossil fuels and
diamonds.
Zosia Gizicki - If anyone harbours any doubt that creationists are mentally unwell then
look no further than the comments from 007Truthseeeker and his army of Orcs
further down this page. How can any sane person believe the gibberish in
Genesis? O_o